Archive by Author

Mac OS X Bluetooth A2DP Sound Quality

Have you bought a pair of bluetooth stereo headphones and paired them up to your Mac?

Have you noticed that they sound crappy and tinny?

There’s a reason!

Turns out that the default minimum quality in OS X is pretty low. I guess the OS and the bluetooth device negotiate this, and if the device doesn’t provide anything (because it’s say a cheap bluetooth adaptor you got from china), it defaults to the minimum. The minimum is a bad thing mkay?

So let’s change it.

If you have the developer tools installed, you can use Bluetooth Explorer to change the minimum bit pool by going into the special options item in the utilities menu. But there’s an easier way.

Simply open up the terminal and paste this in there:

defaults write com.apple.BluetoothAudioAgent “Apple Bitpool Min (editable)” 58

Once that’s done, restart your machine

58 might be a little high, and from what I’ve read, people have had success from 40 up. But 58 is working great for me.

Now get back to enjoying your tunes in a wireless fashion.

Amazon Kindle: The real review

About a week before Christmas, I broke down and bought a kindle. I had been using the iPhone kindle app for a couple of months, and had been teetering on the edge for a while. Then the prices came down and it pushed me over. I’ve now got a good 5 books read on it and I would like to share them with you. It’s my blog and that is my prerogative.

The Hardware:

The Kindle is very light and very thin. It’s hard to get a sense of it’s size without holding it, but it’s very comfortable to hold and operate with one hand. The buttons are very well laid out, and the keyboard, while tiny, serves its function well enough.

The screen is reflective only, meaning no backlight, so no reading in the dark. I view this as good thing personally as backlit screens tend to create eye-strain. It has relatively high pixel density and looks very good, if wanting for a bit of contrast.

The battery lasts a very very long time. Like really. long. Which is a major major winner. My battery lasted 3 weeks on its last charge.

The Books:

There’s a lot to cover here, so I’ll break it down into a handful of major topics: Pricing, Quality, Availability, and DRM.

  • Pricing: Most books can be had for $9.99 or less, which falls right beneath my pain point for books. I have no problem paying this for books even if I tend to think it’s a little high. Why do I think it’s high? Largely because I can buy a paperback book almost invariably for exactly the same price, and I know that 80% of the cost of a paperback book is consumed in its manufacture and transport. Amazon is currently in a pissing war with Macmillan over pricing, which I won’t get into here. But understand that it actually has nothing to do with prices of individual books, but in who has control over pricing to consumers. Personally I think Amazon is in the right, but it’s not something I want to go into any detail about. I will say however that $15 for an ebook is past my pain point, and it will make me think twice before buying. more on that later.

  • Quality: This has been a big issue for me, and one that really drives my opinions on pricing more than most other things. As I said in my ruminations over the iPad, of the 15 books I’ve bought for the kindle (more than I’ve read, more on that later) around 30% have multiple spelling errors or major layout problems. This is to say nothing of the non-fiction books that don’t have linked tables of contents, or linked footnotes, two of the major benefits of having e-books. I’m currently reading a book called Flawless Consulting, which as you can see costs $33 for the ebook. I bought it for the convenience, and ability to notate that the kindle offers despite already owning a hardcopy.
    The kindle edition is awful. Almost all the inset notations in the text are converted to images rather than text, which means you can’t highlight them, notate them, and they’re scanned in a low resolution so you can barely read them. Many of those inset notations scans also run into the body text, so you switch from an image to text mid-sentence. This makes the book completely unreadable on the iPhone and is extremely aggravating on the Kindle. This sort of thing is completely unacceptable, especially if you’re charging close to the asking price of the printed book. I would expect the same amount of proofing done on e-books that goes into prints, but that is clearly not happening. Publishers are being extremely lazy about ebooks, and being dragged kicking and screaming into the game. Amazon needs to be doing quality checks on its ebooks before allowing them to go on sale if publishers aren’t going to do it. This is easily the worst part of e-books at the moment.

  • Availability: This was a big factor in making the decision to buy a Kindle or a Nook. I searched though my current Amazon wishlist to see how many books were available to each device. I’d say Amazon had something like 70% and B&N had something like 40-50%, and every B&N book was $2-3 more expensive.

  • DRM: I hate DRM. I don’t own any DRM’d music. DRM removes your ability to lend your e-books, transfer them to another device, sell them, or buy them used. It’s a major encumbrance and potentially a major additional expense that simply doesn’t exist for print books. So why buy a product with DRM? Largely because, like music, I don’t think it’s going to last. Like the music industry, I think once we’re a few years down the road, the publishers are going to figure out that all DRM can be trivially cracked, and there’s just no putting that genie back in the bottle. As it stands, Kindle DRM can be stripped right now, and the files can be backed up to my computer and read with whatever I want. So I’m not terribly concerned about the negative effects of DRM on me. I don’t know if I need to take a major moral stand against a technology and mentality so completely compromised and so inevitably doomed. Had mp3s not fallen, I might have made a different choice, and I may very well end up eating my words, but as I see it now, DRM has a limited life whether I’m paying for products using it or not. The publishers will eventually see the same thing the record companies did: that the world doesn’t end when you send out unprotected files. Make your books cheap and really easy to buy, and people will buy them. There’s a reason Apple is one of the world’s biggest music sellers right now.

The Experience:

How the kindle will change your habits will depend very heavily on what your relationship with books is currently. It’s change my habits in some pretty significant ways.

  • Reading: I read much more now. I used to read about 1 book a month or so, and now I’ve done about 5 books in 2 months. I always have either my iPhone or my Kindle with me, so I can read any time I have dead-space in my day. I hate carrying around books, so this has given me a lot more time to read, even if it’s more scattered.

  • Buying: This is something that Publishers should pay a lot of attention to, because pricing matters. Before when I heard of an interesting book from a friend, or heard about one on the radio, I would hop on Amazon when I got to a computer and throw it on the wishlist along with a little explanation of where I heard about it. I don’t do that anymore. At least not for most books. Now I pretty much just buy them. A big part of that is the $9.99 or lower price. Another part is that the book is there instantly, and there for me whenever I decide I want to start reading it. Speaking as someone who spends a lot of time professionally trying to measure and influence customer behavior, this is a really big shift and a really big deal. I’m sure Amazon gets it, because I’m sure they track it. I don’t think the big publishers get it. The flip side of this is that I’m actually more reluctant to buy print editions of books now, and will generally hit the “i want to read this on my kindle” link on amazon instead. They then go into the wishlist bucket like before, but now I’m just waiting to see when the kindle version arrives.

  • General Use: The Kindle is really intuitive for the most part and it just gets out of your way. While I wouldn’t mind having a clock at the top of the screen while reading, and I’d like to be able to customize screen savers without hacking it, those are not big deals. You can impulse buy books right from the kindle and have them ready to read in a few seconds. In fact while typing this, I was trying out the search function and bought a book. It cost $8. I’ll take it.

The Verdict:

I like mine a lot and I would recommend one to pretty much everyone who reads more than a couple of books a year. It’s changed the way I read books in a pretty big way. The kindle as a device is right in so many ways, it’s hard to see something like the iPad really competing with it as a reader, if for no other reason than form factor and battery life.

Publishers really need to get on the ball with ebook quality though, especially if they expect to continue charging at or near the same price as printed books. Quality control is really bad, and in some books it really makes them hard to read.

iPad observations

We all know about the newest apple device by now, here are my impressions:

Big iPhone: This was a really good decision on Apple’s part. It would have been a major mistake to put the full version of Mac OS X on this machine. It needs an OS that is rooted in the touch interface from top to bottom.

Apple has shown with keynote and pages that you can build full fledged applications to work on the iPad with more or less all the functionality of a desktop app, so we’re not constrained to “mini-apps” like on the iPhone.

Unfortunately Apple remains the sole gatekeeper of which apps will make it onto the store, and therefore which apps will make it on to your iPad. Gone is even the pretense of needing to do this as a measure to protect cell phone networks. Apple doesn’t need to be the gatekeeper, it just wants to be. They think it offers a better experience, and it many cases that’s probably true. Unfortunately you still end up with situations like the Google Voice app, where Apple can simply kill dead anything they don’t like. That still sucks a big one.

As for steve saying that the iphone provides a better web browsing and e-mail experience than a laptop, I’ll believe it when I see it. Any web browser that doesn’t have options to block ads is not a better experience. Also, if a browser doesn’t have flash, it’s not a better experience. There are full websites built with flash. I don’t mind not seeing them on my iPhone. But it would be a big problem with my main couch surfing machine.

Hardware: It looks like Apple was taking aim at the netbook segment, as its screen size and resolution are almost identical to most netbooks. It’s bigger than the kindle, but smaller than the kindle DX. Without holding one, it’s hard to get a sense of how it would feel. I really like the kindle, but it’s clearly not meant to be a web browsing device.

Like the iPhone, it’s an incredibly closed piece of hardware. No USB ports, no access to the file system, all connections going through the dock connector, no memory expansion slots, etc.

The screen sounds nice, but the a ppi of 132 seems too low for reading books without eyestrain.

No webcam? Seriously? You don’t think this thing would be great for video ichats? What the hell?

I don’t believe for one second that this thing will get 10 hours of battery life. Apple is notorious for stretching the truth on this one, and I’d be shocked if it made it through a work day.

eBook Reader: I bought a kindle around christmas and my review is still forthcoming so take the following with a grain of salt.

Backlit displays are hard on your eyes. They create a large contrast in light levels between the screen and your surroundings, which is why most display calibration software recommends turning brightness way down, or why LCDs on your laptops are unreadable in bright sunlight.

Unfortunately this ends up reducing contrast on the display itself, making the darks and the lights closer to one another. This is also hard on the eyes.

That, along with the battery savings is why amazon chose e-ink. You need front lighting so you’re guaranteed the same light levels as the surroundings, and the contrast of the screen itself is fixed. It’s more like a book. If you start to get eye-strain, you simply put more light on it.

Also, as I mentioned earlier, the pixel density seems too low. This also creates eye strain.

And while it’s cute and all, it’s just stupid to waste 200 pixels or whatever to render the unturned pages on the side of a book. I know Apple probably feels it’s got pixels to burn, but it makes the text seem lopsided, and I’d rather just have text span the whole space.

While it’s great that Apple is using the ePub format, and that makes it great for publishers who want to reach a lot of devices, it’s still undoubtedly using DRM, so who gives a shit what format you choose if I can’t move my books over to another device?

Letting publishers set whatever prices they want is fucking stupid if you ask me, and going to result in slower sales. There will have to be significant differences between a kindle offering and an iPad offering if you’re going to charge 2-5 dollars more per book on average. And you know what publishers are going to do to demand that higher price? Absolutely fucking nothing. Sure authors can add video if they want, but they won’t. Why?

Because publishers still hate e-books. They’re being dragged kicking and screaming into the market, and they’re just barely playing the game. One of my complaints about the Kindle is that out of the 15 or so books I’ve bought, probably 30% have significant layout or spelling errors, where the text was obviously typeset for a book, and probably not finally proof-read. This isn’t on old books either. While publishers are massively benefiting from dramatically lower costs of production, and cutting out the middle men book stores, they still charge very close to the cost of a printed book, and obviously do less work. I rarely see more than one or two spelling mistakes in printed books, and I can’t think of the last time I saw a layout error.

If publishers can’t even be bothered to proof e-books (a product on which they make significantly higher margins, and also get other massive benefits like killing lending and reselling), what possible justification can they have for demanding 90% of the price of a printed product? Apple simply letting them name their price is a bad idea, and will largely be used by publishers to put pressure on Amazon to raise prices. Presumably Apple expects publishers to put more work into the iPad versions of books to justify the price difference with Amazon. If they honestly believe that, they’re delusional.

Also presumably like the kindle, there will be no lending or sharing. Who knows if you can annotate, bookmark, use a dictionary, clip text, load free books from other sources, etc that you can currently do with the Kindle.

Personally I think e-ink has a real chance of replacing printed books. I don’t know if LCDs will get to that place any time soon without better lighting techniques and better resolution.

The Uniqueness of Humans

The Uniqueness of Humans: Find 40 minutes to watch this. It’s great.

Arizona 2010 State of the State address

In case you didn’t know, Arizona’s leadership is completely fucked. Since the whitehouse drafted our previous governor, Jan Brewer has stepped in to try and navigate the mess that is Arizona politics. And it hasn’t gone all that well. Since taking office, she’s been consistently in opposition to both parties in the state legislature, and has fostered animosity between the sheriff, county board of supervisors, and our attorney general and judges. There’s a tremendous power grabbing pissing match going on and as far as I can tell, Jan has done little to nothing to get it under control.

And it turns out that when that whole housing bubble burst, we were kind of in a bad place. See, when the money is rolling in, who cares about hedging risk right? New construction was booming and we were living fat off of taxes on new property sales, and property taxes on existing homes that continued to escalate in value. Little thought went into who exactly would live in all these new houses, and who would work in these new commercial buildings. It’s not like we have a diverse corporate infrastructure here in Arizona. Not like we have a surplus of high paying white collar jobs. We had construction jobs.

Well as I’m sure you are aware, that house of cards collapsed and our tax base went into free-fall and our legislature went into denial. Controlled by republicans, they simply refuse to raise taxes, and just don’t want to cut any of the benefits they promised their buddies in the business community. And of course the democrats don’t want to cut spending on social services or education.

So Jan Brewer, proving herself extremely ineffective in rallying her own party, controlling her subordinates, or engaging folks from across the aisle has issued a battle cry in her 2010 state of the state address. And it’s a fucking mess. It’s clear that Gov. Brewer doesn’t have the political clout to make things happen in Arizona, and her address largely comes off as a whining screed blaming everyone else for the problems of the state, rambling incoherently about public policy philosophy and morality, and insisting that she’s got the right people to fix things if only everyone would stop fighting her.

I’m going to pull choice bits from the address and make fun of them. Enjoy:

Honesty, versus lies. Right, versus wrong. Those are the choices Arizona faces. The essence of the challenge laid at our feet.

In a homage to George Bush the First, I was waiting to see the good verses evil line. Jan pushes hard from the beginning for her brand of moral absolutism. Governing isn’t really all that complicated, and if you don’t agree with me and my policy decisions, then you’re probably corrupt or more interested in politics than in helping people. We’re off to a strong start.

They carried out their perilous work with consummate skill and calm. And then before disengaging — came upon yet another device. The discovery came too late. With his last breath on this earth, this courageous man shouted a warning to his two fellow guardsmen. He saved their lives. He gave his own.

While my speech will barely mention the military, it’s always a good thing to associate yourself with bravery, patriotism and heroism. See, I’m just like this hero guy. The fact this guy gave his life for his country makes the stuff I’m about to say seem more relevant, urgent and meaningful.

Last spring, you will recall that I offered you a five-point approach to resolving this fiscal crisis and restoring our economic vitality. In my year on the job I have grown wiser — and time has grown shorter. And I know times are tough. So today, let me open these proceedings by offering you a deal — a 40% cutback…I’m going to boil my 5 points — down to 3.

I’ve tried to push this agenda for almost a year, and I haven’t gotten anywhere. What if I cut it back to just 3 things. Would you do it then? Pretty please?

The economy has still not recovered, our revenues are still depressed and there is no avoiding this hardship. More state jobs are going to be shed and services are going to be further curtailed or lost. Let me be clear, in the history of this state no other Governor has cut state government more than I have.

I’m not going to bother to actually look up the data on this in inflation adjusted dollars, because the statement itself is just ridiculous. Government exists to provide services to its constituents. Want to cut government? It’s not really that hard. What’s hard is improving efficiency and eliminating waste. Sometimes that requires short term infusions of capital to improve automation, or execute process redesign. You know, the hard work of actual governing. Just cutting budgets and telling state institutions to suck it up no matter what is not effective governance. Jan seems to be unaware of this distinction.

Government must live within its means. I did not create this situation — but I intend to resolve it — and continue telling the people the truth about it.

It’s not my fault. Really. And it’s not my fault that I essentially haven’t done anything for a year to resolve the problem. You’re all just in denial about our problems. I am the only one who knows our hardship. My heart is heavy with this burden. BTW: Napolitano really did this to us. It’s all her fault. Also, for some reason she won’t get the government to pay for our immigration problem. She’s a bad person.

And let me make one point very clear. I have great respect for everyone in this chamber, and your contributions to our state.

You are all fuckwads who have done nothing but fiddle while rome burns. (which BTW I agree with)

But there is no one here, and no one elsewhere, who has fought any longer or harder than I have for lower taxes, job growth and economic freedom in Arizona. So, spare us the profiles in courage; it’s time for a little less profile and a little more courage.

My entire speech so far has been me painting my own profile in courage. But you guys should really lay off that.

But if we do not act decisively, we will look to the west to California and see our future — government over-grown — people over-taxed — borders over-run — employers over a barrel — and freedom … simply over.

See how badly those democrats have fucked up california? Well sure their governor is a republican like me, but he’s really a closet liberal. – Employers over a barrel? Yeah it’s awful, all that capital flight from california. Oh what’s that? California still has a tremendous tax base funded in part by some of the most successful and largest companies in the world? And why haven’t they moved to Arizona again? Oh because California continues to create and attract the smartest people in the world? riiiiiiight.

And what the fuck does she mean that freedom is simply gone in California? Did LA become Stalingrad when I wasn’t looking? Has she tried crossing the border from California into Arizona recently? You know, those places that the supreme court has ruled are “constitution free zones”? Those places far into Arizona land where federal agents can stop and search you without probable cause to conduct a “routine search”?

Or has she perhaps read up about Sheriff Joe’s immigration sweeps where if you’re a certain shade of brown you will be pulled over and forced to show your papers?

Our federal government has reached new levels of arrogance, foolishness and disregard for the Constitution. The biggest external threat to our budget comes from the federal government — oppressive health care mandates, job-killing environmental restrictions, and continual refusal to pay for costs associated with illegal immigration.

It’s hard to rebut the constitution part, partially because I have no fucking idea what she’s talking about. But this is just pure party-line bullshit. I guess arrogance and foolishness are the chief characteristics you need to actually function as an effective politician. Say what you want about Obama, but he’s getting shit done in the face of significant opposition. What are you doing again? Oh right, nothing.

When you begin by spreading the wealth around — you end up destroying it.

You have no fucking clue what you’re talking about. More equitable distribution of wealth across classes has been shown time and time again to lead to better social outcomes and more political stability. It doesn’t fucking destroy anything. It just means rich people don’t get richer. The redistribution of wealth from the middle class to the super rich is a major part of why our economy is so fucked up right now. And you have no idea what I’m talking about because you were a fucking chiropractor (quack) and realtor before starting your political life. How’s that macro-economics reading list going? I thought so.

The President and the Congress tell us they are going to help by reducing costs. In reality, what they are doing is eliminating freedom for our citizens, dictating the policies they must buy for their families, and forcing our employers and the state to pick up the tab.

Not just the president, but the GAO and respectable party neutral organizations have acknowledged that the bill currently being reconciled will reduce health care costs considerably. Want to really reduce costs and improve the quality of healthcare? Go to a single payer system and put doctors on salaries. Its been shown over and over again that doing this increases quality of care and lowers costs. It’s fine if you want to live in a free-market fantasy where private business is the ideal solution to all problems, that’s fine, but don’t criticize the people who actually know what they’re talking about.

The federal government is also failing to control our southern border and refusing to pay for its failure. The cost of incarcerating these criminal aliens is not Arizona’s responsibility. It is Washington’s legal and moral obligation.

What? Why? While it’s absolutely a shared government responsibility to keep national borders safe from attack, why is it not a state responsibility to police its own borders? So you’re all about state’s rights and independence when it comes to mandated health care, but you’re all about government intervention on illegal immigration?

So, the ruinous cost of healthcare isn’t a widespread national concern that requires government intervention. It’s a state by state concern and should be left for private industry to fix on it’s own, i.e. you shouldn’t have to fix it. And porous borders on 3 states are a massive national concern that should be enforced and paid for by the government, i.e. you shouldn’t have to fix it. Got it.

Washington also likes to pretend that Government creates jobs. But, we know better. No government ever created a dollar of wealth or a dime of capital. Only the free market can do that.

You should have a grasp of economics, but we know better. Government policies including the fed rate, regulation, trade agreements, monopoly and patent protectionism, law enforcement and taxation generate or annihilate wealth, and either inspire capital investment or flight. They also enforce, extend or reduce class distinctions. There is no genuine free market in the US, nor should there be. There’s no such thing as a level playing field, and there’s always information asymmetry that well placed players can use to dominate markets.

It might be one thing if you were Ron Paul, and actually had read up on the austrian economics school (which is completely wrong headed, but is at least concerned and relatively informed). Or were a die-hard Greenspan/Randite, but you’re not. You’re just spouting the same mantra that flew our economy straight into the ground. Where where you for the last 2 years? Even Greenspan has recanted that shit.

In many ways, it’s the “free market” that has caused major systematic vulnerabilities in our economy. Specifically neo-liberal free trade agreements with countries that essentially allow for slave labor, wide-spread pollution, zero workplace safety, and manipulate their currencies to keep exchange rates favorable. They also charge marginal taxes that do nothing to offset the massive costs of the externalities that these companies impose on their host countries. They can do this because even those small taxes can make a small group very very rich, and that small group doesn’t give a shit about what the skies will look like when their grandkids are having kids. This is what is encouraging capital flight and suppressing wages, and driving unemployment in the US.

As long as I am your Governor, the sign out front will always read ARIZONA IS OPEN FOR BUSINESS.

Since I don’t understand any of the above, and don’t have any education on long term public policy philosophy, I don’t understand how to produce anything but a burned out industrial husk of a state with no real culture, education, business or population diversity. So hell, the only thing I can do is promise massive tax incentives to artificially lower operating costs for businesses in opposition to my previous free-market fantasy statement. I don’t understand that this kind of government intervention into the market is ironically the opposite of my stated objectives. I know our budget is fucked, but I don’t understand how decimating the business tax base will impact the state’s revenues. My business consultants assure me that this will bring in additional jobs and businesses so we’ll have more income taxes, sales taxes and property taxes, but I’ve never read any studies that prove this almost never happens and that states almost never recoup the lost tax revenue. I also don’t know that most of these companies always promise full time work, and always deliver part time, low paid positions that end up suppressing labor costs, encouraging labor mobility to other states, and pushing healthcare costs onto state and federal governments because they don’t provide benefits.

Just a few days ago, I helped secure an agreement from Tower Automotive to come to Arizona and invest more than $50 million, and create nearly 200 quality jobs.

I won’t detail the promised tax breaks, or reduced property prices or taxes we’ll award to these businesses to start up. Largely because they would make a stupid 50 million dollar capital investment look small. The fact that I crow about the possibility of 200 new jobs, and imply that’s a major win for my administration shows just how pathetic and desperate I really am. I mean, that would be pretty weak for a mayor. I’m a freakin governor.

We need to do more to un-shackle our job creators.

We need to roll back business and capital gains taxes, reduce enforcement on the taxes that we still decide to charge, offer sweetheart deals on state owned land and state offered services, provide infrastructure support at taxpayer expense, reduce enforcement of labor laws, you know the kinds of things that really inspire business investment and build strong communities.

Second, I will be allocating a significant portion of remaining federal stimulus funds directly to bring new jobs to Arizona.

Remember that bullshit about free markets I was spouting earlier? This is not another contradiction. This is not a government intervention into free markets that favors some businesses over others and gives them significant advantages over their competitors both locally and in other states. Remember that bullshit about federal arrogance and foolishness? Well giving us money for this was not the stuff I was talking about.

Third, under the leadership of Jerry Colangelo and Commerce Director Don Cardon … I have created the Governor’s Commerce Advisory Council. Working with other Arizona business leaders, they will transform the Department of Commerce into an engine for job creation.

So you know that guy who owns the suns, the mercury and ran the coyotes into bankruptcy? The guy who pays no property taxes on his stadiums in borderline illegal land lease deals? Oh and that guy who oversaw the housing bubble in Arizona as director of the department of housing? The guy who brokers these massive tax rebates and subsidies now as commerce director?

These two guys are going to fix business in Arizona. Largely by giving away the farm in special interest deals to their personal buddies from which they will undoubtedly take a cut. But hey, at least I don’t have to do it.

And — while I’m talking about jobs let me say we should do everything we can to see that Arizona is named a training site for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.

Remember earlier when I said that the government doesn’t create wealth or capital, well I still mean that, but I guess it does create jobs and feed families. And this would represent a massive influx into state coffers. But government is still bad.

I’d like to recognize the work to-date by the regents and Presidents of our universities and community colleges…in response to my call for a new higher- education model that promotes greater access, quality and affordability.

I won’t mention the unilateral budget cuts that lead to job cuts across all of our universities with no consideration to actual spending needs. They can suck it up.

Isn’t it astonishing that in Arizona today, Bill Gates or Craig Barrett would not be considered qualified to teach students about computer science? We must stop our gate keeping and open the doors to all qualified and skilled citizens who want to teach our children.

So we have a shortage of skilled teachers? Really? Might that have anything to do with teacher’s salaries? I’m sure Bill Gates would love to come in and teach computer science for a college professor’s salary. Really. What we’re really saying here is:

We must crush teachers unions and the tenure system at universities because they are socialist and bad. I have no appreciation for the skills necessary for effective child or adult education, and think I could come in and control a classroom with zero preparation. I believe that success in a particular field is entirely determined by skill and resolve and has nothing to do with luck. It has not occurred to me that Bill Gates’ success was largely determined by his sociopathic need to win above all other things, including technical skill. I will ignore the fact that despite literally a mountain of Ph.Ds at his beck and call, he cannot produce a product that doesn’t suck in almost every way, and succeeds almost entirely due to early, barely above board, and often below board bribery to institutions and manufacturers.

But we must give parents the ability to make the best choices for their children. Starting with where they go to school. We lead the nation in school choice. In Arizona –a parent’s right to choose the best school must endure — whether that’s a district, private, charter or home school.

Our public schools fucking suck. We are consistently ranked among the bottom 3 in the nation. But that’s because of the dirty mexicans. White parents don’t want their kids going to school with dirty mexicans who can’t even speak english, so it’s important that we encourage gentrification and white flight to the suburbs and exburbs. If everyone had to go to a school in their own district, that means we’d actually have to deal with the problems in our shitty public schools rather than offer parents an easy out.

Also, our state is dominated by old people who hate taxes, and especially hate paying for the education of little mexican kids. So our elementary education system will remain underfunded and under-resourced. But that’s okay because rich people don’t have to use them, and poor people don’t vote. That’s a win/win in my book.

We must also arm parents with the information they need to help monitor their children’s academic progress. We will make sure they have up-to-date data that is available on-line –at any time. Sorry, kids, no more losing your report card!

The reason your kids are dumb is that you’re not making the effort of giving them the education we don’t really care to provide. You should really be doing our job, despite the fact that our economy is in shambles and you have to work 3 part time jobs just to make ends meet and maybe see your kids 2 hours a day. Doing this at least lets us place the blame on your shoulders by claiming that we’ve been telling you your kids are dumb on a regular basis and you did nothing about it.

And we should know well before third grade those students who are falling behind and get them the help they need. I look forward to working with Senator John Huppenthal and Representative Rich Crandall and other members to enact these reforms.

Who’s going to pay for that extra help? Fuck if I know. Johnny and Richy will figure that out.

First, I’m establishing the Commission on Privatization and Efficiency or “COPE”. COPE will identify state services and agencies whose functions can be eliminated, consolidated, streamlined or outsourced to achieve greater operational efficiency in meeting the needs of our citizens.

I fucking hate my job. It’s hard keeping track of all this government shit. Why can’t we just pay our buddies to do this for us at crazy rates? Of course they’ll offer inferior or no service, but it’ll probably cost us less over-all. At least for a couple of years until rate increases start happening every year and we’re held hostage by the small group of businesses that we fed like hungry ticks while starving out other local companies and decimating our in house expertise, leaving us with no choices and no options to recover when we’re fucked. Did I mention that private business does everything better than any government agency could do? I mean like everything. Never mind that private business has an incentive system that is systematically and diametrically opposed to the public good. I don’t understand that the whims of investors and their ongoing need for ever growing profits might not actually increase efficiency, but in fact lead to taxpayers getting ripped off. I haven’t read up about any other states doing this kind of thing, like say the wholesale deregulation and privatization of california’s energy infrastructure. I think that went peachy.

While we agree we must provide essential services for those with no place else to turn…we must only offer those benefits necessary and ensure that we have a program free of abuse or waste.

We must decrease visits to high cost settings like emergency rooms — and encourage those receiving state service to take personal responsibility for their own health, as all Arizonans should.

If you’re sick, it’s your fault. Eat less twinkies fatty. We shouldn’t pay for it. You should. Don’t have the money to pay for it? Die. Thanks.

Third, budget cuts within state government have resulted in reduced or limited funding for services for our most vulnerable — the elderly, disabled and low- income residents. Therefore, I’m establishing Arizona Serves. With the assistance of the Arizona Department of Economic Security, Arizona Serves will connect faith-based and non-profit organizations to help meet those needs.

On second thought, if you are sick and poor, maybe this is an opportunity to funnel public and federal funds into churches and non-profits that my buddies run. Hey. This might just work. Maybe I’ll net a fat directorship out of one of them if I lose the election. That would be sweet. God knows I don’t know what the fuck I’m doing here.


I won’t go in to her awful concluding comments. Ugh. Yet another shitty Arizona governor.

Mini Review: Apple Magic Mouse

Yesterday I got my Apple Magic Mouse, and here are my quick first impressions:

  1. Design is beautiful as you would expect
  2. Had to download the driver, and uninstall USB overdrive before I had access to all the mouse’s functions.
  3. Scrolling from anywhere is awesome
  4. Same “lift left finger for right click” mechanic. Lame. You think they’d be able to figure this out.
  5. Mouse tracking is too slow at it’s highest setting
  6. Two finger movements for backwards and forwards are awkward. With my thumb on one side of the mouse and my pinkie and ring finger on the other side, my hand is close to the maximum comfortable separation between middle and ring fingers. Swiping left from this position puts a lot of strain on the hand. I find I just have to completely remove my fingers from the right hand side of the mouse to make a left swipe and use my thumb to hold the mouse in place. I’m sure it’s something I’ll get used to, but it’s very annoying at first, especially if you’re used to hitting a button at your thumb.
  7. No middle click. I’m used to using a middle click to open links in a new tab. There’s currently no way to assign a middle click on this mouse.

My overall impression is a little lackluster. I’ll give the mouse a couple of weeks of use to see how it pans out, but I have a feeling I’ll be heading back to my logitech.

Snow Leopard Font Smoothing

Do fonts look like crap on your shiny new copy of snow leopard?

That’s probably because Snow Leopard now relies on your monitor to tell your machine that it’s an LCD. Unfortunately, many LCDs including both of my Dell displays don’t do this. So you get no sub-pixel anti-aliasing. Bad times.

But don’t fret. There is a solution. Open up a terminal window and type:

defaults -currentHost write -globalDomain AppleFontSmoothing -int 2

and all will be well again.

Drive Economics

As of right now, I have a Drobo filled with 1TB drives that I’m pretty happy with. After a couple of weeks of pain the new Drobo has settled down, and we’re peacefully co-existing.

But I’m running out of space. With 4 1TB drives, you end up with about 2.7TB of usable space, and I’m at a little over 2 right now.

Now I could start throwing stuff away, but the whole point of a drobo is that you can just add bigger drives. So I decided to check things out and see what it would look like from a space/price point of view.

Now, you can’t just add one larger drive to the drobo, at least not one larger drive that’s bigger than all the others, because it won’t use all the space. If I toss in a 2TB drive into one of the slots, I won’t add 2TB of space, because it won’t have enough space on the other drives for parity data. It will just reserve that space. So at a minimum, you have to replace 2 drives.

That leave me in a situation where I have to install 3TB of drives to gain an additional .5TB of space, or and additional 4TB of drives to get an additional .9TB of space. Both because you’re discarding 2TB of space with the replacements.

So lets just replace all the 1TB drives with 1.5TB and 2.0TB drives.

4×1TB drives – current – 2.7TB usable space
4×1.5TB drives – $440 – 4.1TB usable space
4×2.0TB drives – $880 – 5.5TB usable space

so if I spend $440, I gain 1.4TB of space total.
If I spent $880, I gain 2.8TB of space total.

In both situations I have 4 1TB discarded drives sitting on a shelf, or thrown in to replace scratch drives or whatever.

Neither of these options is very attractive. But there’s another way I can gain 2.7TB of protected storage for cheap: Buy another drobo!

4×1TB drives – $320
Drobo – $350

so for $670, I gain the same as switching to 2TB drives. But of course, I now have 8 drives in 2 cases with data across 2 volumes.

Of course another way to look at it is:

$880 gets you 5.5TB online, 2.7TB offline
$660 gets you 5.4TB online, none offline

so for the $220 difference, can you find something to do with the additional 2.7TB protected or 3.7 unprotected?

And yes, I’m a little bored.

My Kindle Mini-review

I’ve been very reluctant to buy a Kindle. Not because I don’t think e-readers are a great technology. They are. I’ve been reluctant because when you use a Kindle, you’re entering a walled garden. The books you “buy” don’t have the same benefits as a printed book. You cannot loan them to friends, can’t donate them to a library, can’t sell them to a book store. In short, you don’t really own them, you buy a perpetual license to read them.

Now, that alone can be a big deal breaker. But we have to remember there are benefits that printed books don’t offer. I can have hundreds or thousands of books with me all the time, and not have cases and cases of books taking up space in my home. It’s awesome having a book with you everywhere.

In that spirit, I downloaded the Kindle iPhone app and got a couple of books that I’ve been wanting to read. The first was Micheal Lewis’ “Liar’s Poker”. Reading on the iPhone is surprisingly nice once you’ve dialed in the right font size and background color.

I’ve loved using it. All those moments where I’m pointlessly waiting in a line, I can now spend reading. Awesome.

Also, it’s incredibly gratifying to hear about a book from a friend, or listen to an author on the radio, and be able to immediately buy the book and start reading on the spot. Instant gratification is awesome.

But I won’t be buying any more books for the Kindle, or buying a physical device. Why?

The 1984 debacle. Amazon apparently got copies of 1984 and Animal Farm pulled into its store without permission of the actual copyright holders. Once it was made aware of the issue, it removed the books from every kindle and refunded the purchase price. It undid the deal.

So much for that perpetual license to read your “purchased” books huh? This was a completely bone-headed move. Amazon should have noted the number of copies out there, removed the further ability to buy it, and found some financial settlement that compensated the rights holders, just as if they had printed and sold books without permission.

Now Amazon is promising that it won’t ever delete books off of the Kindle again, but how do we know that they’ll keep that promise.

Walled garden services like this live or die off of trust in the provider. The license you’re buying depends on amazon maintaining their servers, and staying in business at the very least. At the worst, you’re depending on Amazon to not capriciously change the deal whenever it’s beneficial to them. Rather than just buying an object, you’re now entering into a long term relationship. And Amazon is now saying “Oh it’s okay baby. I was just angry. I won’t hit you ever again. I promise.”

Well bullshit. As pointed out in the article, it’s not clear that Amazon had the right to remove the books in the first place, at least according the the license agreement. What’s to keep them from doing the same thing or worse later on? Unfortunately, pretty much nothing. So it’s a relationship in which the other party gets to make all the rules and change them whenever they feel like it. No thanks.

Amazon has got a lot more work to do to rebuild trust in their walled garden than simply saying sorry and that it won’t happen again. They need to plainly spell out what exact rights licensees have over the what they have licensed, and exactly what Amazon can do or not do to content on people’s devices.

10.5.7 bugs

There have been lots of people running into lots of issues with 10.5.7. Since I’ve run into a few myself I thought I would piss into the wind here and let the anonymous masses know my pain.

1. Display profiles lost on wake from sleep

This one has been around at least since 10.5.4 but has yet to be fixed. If you use a custom profile for your display, often when you wake your machine, a default washed out profile will be used. You have to open the displays preference pane to make it re-recognize. This happens with my Macbook Pro.

2. Massive UI lags after wake from sleep

I assume this is an issue with the graphics drivers, but I’m not sure. In some circumstances, when waking from sleep, the UI is extremely unresponsive, particularly to window drags and scrolling. Page downs work fine. Only a restart will fix it. This happens with my Macbook Pro.

3. Drive eject issues.

I never really noticed this before 10.5.7, but not it seems like every time I plug in a usb drive, copy a file over to it, then try to eject it, the OS will simply never let it go. It’s not being indexed by spotlight, no windows are open, no files being copied. It just won’t release it. Sometimes it will after 3-5 minutes, sometimes it won’t let it go until restart, sometimes it will work just fine. The fact that Snow Leopard has “improved disk ejecting” as a feature is borderline retarded. This happens on all my machines.

4. Won’t sleep without a CD in the optical drive

Lots of users with particular optical drives (samsung, toshiba, some sonys) lost the ability for their machines to sleep after a defined time of inactivity. This is specifically a 10.5.7 problem, and the only way to resolve it as of now is to keep a disc in the optical drive. This happens with my Hackintosh, but the problem extends to a bunch of Mac Pros and iMacs.