http://joemullins.com/archive/2008/08/06/raw-developer-vs-lightroom-2-and-photoshop.php Because hard drives are cheaper than therapy Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:24:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 http://joemullins.com/archive/2008/08/06/raw-developer-vs-lightroom-2-and-photoshop.php/comment-page-1#comment-16630 karatedog Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:10:19 +0000 http://joemullins.com/?p=679#comment-16630 <p>Lightroom still beats Raw Developer. On PC. And I would look forward to know what this means: "designed and optimized specifically for Mac OS X"</p> Lightroom still beats Raw Developer. On PC. And I would look forward to know what this means: “designed and optimized specifically for Mac OS X”

]]> http://joemullins.com/archive/2008/08/06/raw-developer-vs-lightroom-2-and-photoshop.php/comment-page-1#comment-12982 Gilles Fortin Tue, 16 Dec 2008 04:17:56 +0000 http://joemullins.com/?p=679#comment-12982 <p>Joe you are absolutly right. I have work with both of them and Raw Developer wins in all aspect. RD is faster and more friendly. All its tool are more powerfull like Shadow Fine Tune, Shadow Recovery and tool in the adjust tab. I take care of the noise with NeatImage and shrpen with Focal Blade the same image process in RV & Lr and the Rd is always a winner. If one work with with Photo shop for fine tuning RD is the Raw converter to choose.</p> Joe you are absolutly right. I have work with both of them and Raw Developer wins in all aspect. RD is faster and more friendly. All its tool are more powerfull like Shadow Fine Tune, Shadow Recovery and tool in the adjust tab. I take care of the noise with NeatImage and shrpen with Focal Blade the same image process in RV & Lr and the Rd is always a winner. If one work with with Photo shop for fine tuning RD is the Raw converter to choose.

]]>